<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unlocking the potential of the spoken word?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/</link>
	<description>Sounding out ideas on African languages, sound symbolism, and expressivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mariama</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator>mariama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-2726</guid>
		<description>i want to have more details in ideophone given that i have an presentaton on it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to have more details in ideophone given that i have an presentaton on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday Round Up #46 &#171; Neuroanthropology</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday Round Up #46 &#171; Neuroanthropology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>[...] Dingemanse, Unlocking the Potential of the Spoken Word? Will technology bring back the power of the spoken word? Pundits say yes (but they would, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dingemanse, Unlocking the Potential of the Spoken Word? Will technology bring back the power of the spoken word? Pundits say yes (but they would, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulbul</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>bulbul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>Mark,

you might find &lt;a href=&quot;http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com/2008/05/what-is-secondary-orality.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; discussion of orality (especially of the secondary variety) in the context of biblical studies interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>you might find <a href="http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com/2008/05/what-is-secondary-orality.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> discussion of orality (especially of the secondary variety) in the context of biblical studies interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beijing Sounds</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Beijing Sounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-919</guid>
		<description>How long do we have to wait, Mark? I was all set to link to this lovely post &#8212; only to find you&#039;d decapitated it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long do we have to wait, Mark? I was all set to link to this lovely post &mdash; only to find you&#8217;d decapitated it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Basbøll</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Basbøll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Good point. Maybe I&#039;m just becoming one of those grouchy &quot;decline of literacy&quot; people as I get older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. Maybe I&#8217;m just becoming one of those grouchy &#8220;decline of literacy&#8221; people as I get older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Thomas, sure &#8212; writing has had added advantages. My trouble with Oard&#039;s thesis is simply that there is no such thing as &quot;the rise (again) of orality&quot;. What Oard is talking about is an additional way of storing signals, and of interfacing with information systems. Nice, but nothing to get overexcited about, and certainly not something with &#039;broad implications for many aspects of society&#039;, as he writes. This whole idea about a (re)turn to orality is wholly mistaken because orality has never been away from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, sure &mdash; writing has had added advantages. My trouble with Oard&#8217;s thesis is simply that there is no such thing as &#8220;the rise (again) of orality&#8221;. What Oard is talking about is an additional way of storing signals, and of interfacing with information systems. Nice, but nothing to get overexcited about, and certainly not something with &#8216;broad implications for many aspects of society&#8217;, as he writes. This whole idea about a (re)turn to orality is wholly mistaken because orality has never been away from us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Basbøll</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Basbøll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-905</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m skeptical, or perhaps just worried. The advantage of writing was never just storage. Writing also made language easier to survey, more perspicuous (übersichtlich) as Wittgenstein would say. It has been argued that the study of logic would not have developed if not for writing. So the worry is that with the rise (again) of orality, a certain rigour in our thinking will again be lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m skeptical, or perhaps just worried. The advantage of writing was never just storage. Writing also made language easier to survey, more perspicuous (übersichtlich) as Wittgenstein would say. It has been argued that the study of logic would not have developed if not for writing. So the worry is that with the rise (again) of orality, a certain rigour in our thinking will again be lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oard 2008: Re-entering an age of orality? &#171; Glossographia</title>
		<link>http://ideophone.org/potential-of-the-spoken-word/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Oard 2008: Re-entering an age of orality? &#171; Glossographia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideophone.org/?p=105#comment-901</guid>
		<description>[...] to the publisher, but I thought I&#8217;d pop my head up to mention a fascinating post by Mark at The Ideophone about a brief and ridiculous little note in Science from a couple of months ago that I should have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the publisher, but I thought I&#8217;d pop my head up to mention a fascinating post by Mark at The Ideophone about a brief and ridiculous little note in Science from a couple of months ago that I should have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
